All Issue

2019 Vol.34, Issue 4 Preview Page
28 February 2019. pp. 639-648
Abstract
American English lateral /l/s often become dark depending on their phonological conditions (Catford,1977, 1992). When they appear in a word-final position, for instance, the lateral approximant /l/s are realized as being darker than the ones in the word-initial. The degree of darkness depends on various factors amongst which the regional (Ladefoged and Maddieson, 1996) and syntactic (Bermúdez-Otero,2007) factors have been previously suggested. Sociophonetic factors of the variants that are possibly relevant to the degree of darkness, however, has been less explored. The current study is designed to examine the phonetic properties of /l/ with respect to one of the sociolinguistic factors in terms of gender effects. In order to investigate the gradient and dynamic properties of laterals in male and female speeches, both male and female speakers were requested to produce various types of English /l/s. Laterals were placed in the form of CV1(C)CV2L words and both male and female speakers were asked to read the words. The experiment result showed that female speakers’ /l/s were significantly darker than those of males’, which suggests that the allophonic realization of female speakers is more likely to be close to the so-called ‘standard’ of the language group.
References
  1. Ahn, M. 2015. Lexical Status and the Degree of /l/-darkening. Journal of Korean Society of Speech Sciences 7(3): 73-78.10.13064/KSSS.2015.7.3.073
  2. Ahn, M. 2016. A Comparative Study of Lateral Approximant: General American vs. Metropolitan French. Language Research 52(2): 197-212.
  3. Al-Harahsheh, A. M. A. 2014. Language and Gender Differences in Jordanian Spoken Arabic: A Sociolinguistics Perspective. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 4(5): 872-882. Academy Publisher.10.4304/tpls.4.5.872-882
  4. Bermúdez-Otero, R. 2007. Diachronic phonology. In The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, ed. Paul de Lacy, 497-517. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486371.022
  5. Boersma, P. and D. Weenink. 2017. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer Program]. Version 6.0.26, Retrieved 2 March 2017 from http://www.praat.org/
  6. Browman, C. P. and L. Goldstein. 1995. Gestural Syllable Position Effects in American English. In F. Bell-Berti and L. J. Raphael Eds., Producing Speech: Contemporary Issues. For Katherine Safford Harris. AIP Press: Woodbury, NY.
  7. Catford, J. C. 1977. Fundamental Problems in Phonetics. Bloomington, IN: University of Indianan Press.
  8. Catford, J. C. 1992. A Practical Introduction to Phonetics. Oxford University Press: UK.
  9. Crystal, D. 1984. Should Intruders Keep Out? Who Cares about English Usage? Ed., David Crystal. London: Penguin. 36-44.
  10. Davis, S. 2008. Velarization. The Encyclopedia of the Arabic Language 4, 636-638, Brill: Leiden.
  11. Finegan, E. 2015. Language: Its Structure and Use. 7th edition. Cengage Learning: USA.
  12. Gick, B., F. Cambell, S. Oh and L. Tamburri-Watt. 2006. Toward Universals in the Gestural Organization of Syllables: A Cross-linguistic Study of Liquids. Journal of Phonetics 34(1): 49-72.10.1016/j.wocn.2005.03.005
  13. Huffman, M. K. 1997. Phonetic Variation in Intervocalic Onset /l/‘s in English. Journal of Phonetics 25(2), 115-141.10.1006/jpho.1996.0038
  14. Johnson, K. 1997. Acoustic and Auditory Phonetics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  15. Jones, D. 1966. The Pronunciation of English. London: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Kent, R. and C. Read. 1992. The Acoustic Analysis of Speech. Singular Publishing Group Inc. San Diego, California.
  17. Labov, W. 1966. The Social Stratification of (r) in New York City Department Stores. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
  18. Ladefoged, P. 2001. Vowels and Consonants: An Introduction to the Sounds of Language, Maldern, MA: Blackwell.
  19. Ladefoged, P. and I. Maddieson. 1996. The Sounds of the World's Languages. Oxford: Blackwell.
  20. Ladefoged, P. and K. Johnson. 2011. A Course in Phonetics 6thedition, Wadsworth.
  21. Lakoff, R. 1973. Language and Women’s Place. Language in Society 2.1, 45-80. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/S0047404500000051
  22. Mackenzie, S., P. De Decker and R. Pierson. 2015. An Acoustic and Articulatory Study of /l/ Allomorphy in Newfoundland English. Proceeding of the 18th ICPhS. Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
  23. Marotta, G. and N. Nocchi. 2003. A Phonetic ‘Conspiracy’, Low Vowels and Velarized Lateral in Leghorn Italian. Proceedings of the 15th ICPhS. Barcelona, Spain, 909-912.
  24. Mompeán-Gonzalez, J. A. and P. Mompeán-Guillamón. 2009. /r/-liaison in English: An Empirical Study. Cognitive Linguistics 20.4, 733-776.10.1515/COGL.2009.031
  25. Moosüller, S., C. Schmid and C. H. Kasess. 2015. Alveolar and Velarized Laterals in Albanian and in the Viennese Dialect, Language and Speech 1-28.
  26. Narayanan, S. S. and A. A. Alwan. 1997. Toward Articulatory-acoustic Models for Liquid Approximants Based on MRI and EPG Data. Part I: The Laterals. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 101, 1064-1077.10.1121/1.4180309035398
  27. Pickett, J. M. 1980. The Sounds of Speech Communication. University Park Press.
  28. Recasens, D. and E. Farnetani. 1990. Articulatory and Acoustic Properties of Different Allophones of /l/ in American English, Catalan and Italian. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing 2: 961-964.
  29. Recasens, D., J. Fontdevila and M. Dolors Pallarès. 1995. Velarization Degree and Coarticulatory Resistance for /l/ in Catalan and German. Journal of Phonetics 23: 37-52.10.1016/S0095-4470(95)80031-X
  30. Royal, A. M. 1985. Male/female Pharyngealization Patterns in Cairo Arabic: A Sociolinguistic Study of Two Neighborhoods. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
  31. Sankoff, G. and H. Cedergren. 1972. Sociolinguistic Research on French in Montréal. Language in Society 1.1, 173-174.10.1017/S004740450000662X
  32. Seong, C. 2004. An Acoustic Analysis on the Korean 8 Monothongs - with Respect to the Acoustic Variables on the F1/F2 Vowel Space. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of Korea 23.6, 454-461.
  33. Seong, C. 2005. A Formant Analysis of the Korean Monophthongs of the College Students Speaking Chungnam Dialect. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal 43,189-213.
  34. Trudgill, P. 1974. The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge University Press.
  35. Trugdill, P. 1972. Sex, Covert Prestige and Linguistic Change in the Urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1.2, 179-195.10.1017/S0047404500000488
  36. Wells, J. C. 1982. Accents of English. Vol 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611759
  37. Yuan, J. and M. Liberman. 2011. /l/ Variation in American English: A Corpus Approach. Journal of Speech Sciences 1.2, 35-46.
  38. Yun, J. and C. Seong. 2013. Effects of F1/F2 Manipulation on the Perception of Korean Vowels /o/ and /u/, The Journal of Korean Society of Speech Sciences 5.3, 39-46.10.13064/KSSS.2013.5.3.039
Information
  • Publisher :The Modern Linguistic Society of Korea
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국현대언어학회
  • Journal Title :The Journal of Studies in Language
  • Journal Title(Ko) :언어연구
  • Volume : 34
  • No :4
  • Pages :639-648