Research Article
Abstract
References
Information
This study argues that Korean addressee honorific sentence-final endings, such as -supnita and -yo, constitute an obligatory grammatical category. Unlike previous studies, it focuses on grammatical categoricity within Slobin’s “Thinking for Speaking” framework. While indexicality-based approaches explain interactional meanings, they often overlook why Korean speakers must determine relations prior to an utterance. This study demonstrates that the grammatical obligatoriness of sentence-final marking forces speakers to establish a ‘relational boundary’ before producing an utterance. The alternation between endings is analyzed as a grammatically constrained reorientation of relational attention, rather than a purely pragmatic strategy. By introducing BOUNDARY and ΔBOUNDARY, this study accounts for these alternations as a recalculation of relational judgment. A comparison with English highlights Korean’s typological significance, where relational judgment is grammatically mandated.
- 박지순. 2014. 한국어 상대높임법 실현의 영향 요인 연구.
새국어교육 , 98. 290-324.10.15734/koed..98.201403.290 - 안현정, 권연진. 2014. Honorific Expressions and Registers in Korean.
인문과학연구, 41 . 강원대학교 인문과학연구소, 573-592. - 이익섭, 채완. 1999.
국어문법론강의 . 서울: 학연사. - 정경재. 2016. 20세기 구어 자료에 나타난 명령형 어미의 실현 양상 변화.
한국어학, 72 . 227-255. - 홍종선, 김서형. 2016. 국어과 교재의 상대 높임 화계 설정과 구어 현실.
국어교육학연구, 51 .3, 47-68. - Boroditsky, L. 2001. Does Language Shape Thought?: Mandarin and English Speakers’ Conceptions of Time.
Cognitive Psychology 43 .1, 1-22. 10.1006/cogp.2001.0748 - Brown, R. and Gilman, A. 1960. The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity. In
Style and Language , T.A. Sebeok (ed.), 252-282. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.1515/9783110805376.252 - Brown, L. 2015. Revisiting “polite” -yo and “deferential” -Supnita Speech Style Shifting in Korean from the Viewpoint of Indexicality.
Journal of Pragmatics 79 , 43-59.10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.009 - Choi, S. and Lantolf, J. P. 2008. Representation and Embodiment of Meaning in L2 Communication: Motion Events in the Speech and Gesture of Advanced L2 Korean and L2 English Speakers.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30 .2, 191-224. 10.1017/S0272263108080315 - Choi, Y. S. 2011. The Obligatory Marking of the Hearer’s Social Status in Korean and its Consequences for L2 Acquisition.
Cognitive Linguistics 22 .4, 823-855. - Jakobson, R. 1959. On Linguistic Aspects of Translation. In R. A. Brower (ed.),
On Translation . 232-239. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674731615.c18 - Lee, J. and Brown, L. 2022. Honorifics in the Marketplace: A Multimodal Indexical Analysis.
Korean Linguistics 18 .1, 76-119. 10.1075/kl.20007.lee - Leech, G. 2007. Politeness: Is there an East-West Divide?
Journal of Politeness Research 3 .2, 167-200.10.1515/PR.2007.009 - Levinson, S. C. 1996. Language and Space.
Annual Review of Anthropology 25 , 353-382. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.353 - Levinson, S. C. 2003.
Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity, Vol. 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613609 - Lucy, J. A. 1997. Linguistic Relativity.
Annual Review of Anthropology 26 , 291-312.10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.291 - Lyons, J. 1977.
Semantics , Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. - Phillips, W. and Boroditsky, L. 2003. Can Quirks of Grammar Affect the Way You Think? Grammatical Gender and Object Concepts.
Proceedings of the 25th Annual Cognitive Science Society 25 .25, 928-933. - Silverstein, M. 1976. Shifters, Linguistic Categories, and Cultural Description. In K. H. Basso and H. A. Selby (ed.),
Meaning in Anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 11-55. - Silverstein, M. 2003. Indexical Order and the Dialectics of Sociolinguistic Life.
Language & Communication 23 , 193-229.10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2 - Slobin, D. I. 1996. From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” In J. J. Gumperz and S. C. Levinson (ed.),
Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. 70-96. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. - Slobin, D. I. 2003. Language and Thought Online: Cognitive Consequences of Linguistic Relativity. In D. Gentner and S. Goldin-Meadow (ed.),
Language in Mind. 157-192. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4117.003.0013 - Slobin, D. I. 2004. The Many Ways to Search for a Frog: Linguistic Typology and the Expression of Motion Events. In S. Strőmqvist and L. Verhoeven (ed.),
Relating Events in Narrative: 2. Typological and Contextual Perspectives , 219 -257. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. - Sohn, H. 1999.
The Korean Language . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. - Sohn, H. 2013.
Topics in Korean Language and Linguistics . Seoul: Korea University Press.10.978.897641/8326 - Strauss, S. and Eun, J. O. 2005. Indexicality and Honorific Speech Level Choice in Korean.
Linguistics 43 .3, 611-651.10.1515/ling.2005.43.3.611 - Talmy, L. 1991. Path to Realization: A Typology of Event Conflation.
Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society: General Session and Parasession on The Grammar of Event Sturucture. 480-519.10.3765/bls.v17i0.1620
- Publisher :The Modern Linguistic Society of Korea
- Publisher(Ko) :한국현대언어학회
- Journal Title :The Journal of Studies in Language
- Journal Title(Ko) :언어연구
- Volume : 41
- No :4
- Pages :451-469
- DOI :https://doi.org/10.18627/jslg.41.4.202602.451


The Journal of Studies in Language





