Research Article
Abstract
References
Information
This study examines the impact of peer assessment training on university students’ presentation skills. The research involved 27 students enrolled in an English presentation course at a university. A pre-test and post-test design was implemented, comparing peer and instructor evaluations before and after an eight-week peer assessment training program. Paired-samples t tests revealed that pre-training peer scores were significantly higher than instructor scores (p = .005), whereas post-training results showed no significant difference (p = .367), indicating improved evaluation reliability. Additionally, a survey-based ana demonstrated increased confidence, fairness, and engagement in peer assessment. The findings suggest that structured peer assessment training enhances students’ evaluation accuracy and learning experiences, emphasizing the need for systematic training to improve peer assessment reliability in academic settings.
- 주미란. 2024. 영어발표 과업의 동료 평가에 대한 학습자 인식. 영어어문교육, 30.2, 133-152.10.35828/etak.2024.30.2.133
- 한미향. 2024. 동료피드백이 한국 대학생의 영어 발표 능력에 미치는 영향. 대한언어학회, 32.1, 73-92.
- Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K., and Mylonas, A. 2002. Developing Procedures for Implementing Peer Assessment in Large Classes Using an Action Research Process. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 27.5, 427-441.10.1080/0260293022000009302
- Choi, H. J. 2018. Learner Perception on Peer Assessment in English Presentation Tasks. Studies in English Education 24.2, 133-155.
- Falchikov, N. and Goldfinch, J. 2000. Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks. Review of Educational Research 70.3, 287-322.10.3102/00346543070003287
- Falchikov, N. 2001. Learning Together: Peer Tutoring in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
- Girard, T., Pinar, M., and Trapp, P. 2011. An Exploratory Study of Class Presentations and Peer Evaluations: Do Students Perceive the Benefits? Academy of Educational Leadership Journal 15.1, 77-94.
- Gielen, S., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., Struyven, K., and Smeets, S. 2011. Goals of Peer Assessment and their Associated Quality Concepts. Studies in Higher Education 36.6, 719-735.10.1080/03075071003759037
- Harrington, D. and LeBeau, C. 2009. Speaking of Speech. Tokyo: Macmillan Languagehouse Ltd.
- Nicol, D. J. and Macfarlane-Dick, D. 2006. Formative Assessment and Self‐Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice. Studies in Higher Education 31.2, 199-218.10.1080/03075070600572090
- Panadero, E. and Jonsson, A. 2013. The Use of Scoring Rubrics for Assessing Writing: A Review of the Literature. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 38.3, 305-320.
- Park, M. 2017. The Effects of Collocation Knowledge and Group Collaboration on Korean College Students’ English Presentation. Journal of English Language and Literature 63.1, 45-60.
- Topping, K. J. 1998. Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities. Review of Educational Research 68.3, 249-276.10.3102/00346543068003249
- Topping, K. J. 2009. Peer Assessment. In J. H. McMillan (ed.), SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 41-62.
- Van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., and Tillema, H. H. 2010. Peer Assessment for Learning from a Social Perspective: The Influence of Interpersonal Variables and Structural Features. Educational Research Review 5.1, 41-54.10.1016/j.edurev.2008.11.002
- Zhu, W. 2012. Peer Assessment in the ESL Classroom: A Review of the Literature. TESOL Quarterly 46.3, 540-561.
- Publisher :The Modern Linguistic Society of Korea
- Publisher(Ko) :한국현대언어학회
- Journal Title :The Journal of Studies in Language
- Journal Title(Ko) :언어연구
- Volume : 41
- No :1
- Pages :27-40
- DOI :https://doi.org/10.18627/jslg.41.1.202505.27
The Journal of Studies in Language
