Research Article
Abstract
References
Information
This study examines the phonetic realization of second occurrence focus (SOF) in Korean and its implications for the prosodic phonology-pragmatics interface. First occurrence focus (FOF) and SOF in controlled discourse contexts were obtained from a production experiment. Acoustic measures of duration, F0, and intensity were statistically analyzed. The results show that SOF lacks robust prominence in F0 and intensity, though limited durational differences and subtle F0 variation emerge under finer analyses. The presence of the focus particle –man also affects pitch realization. These findings suggest that SOF in Korean is neither fully prosodically marked nor purely pragmatic, but instead reflects gradient, language-specific interactions between prosody, morphosyntax, and information structure.
- Beaver, D. and Clark, B. Z. 2008.
Sense and sensitivity: How focus determines meaning . Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444304176 - Beaver, D., Clark, B. Z., Flemming, E., Jaeger, T. F., and Wolters, M. 2007. When semantics meets phonetics: Acoustical studies of second-occurrence focus.
Language 83 .2, 245-276. 10.1353/lan.2007.0053 - Bishop, J. 2008. The effect of position on the realization of second occurrence focus.
9th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association , ISCA Archive, http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/interspeech_2008. 10.21437/Interspeech.2008-278 - Chomsky, N. 1976. Conditions on rules of grammar.
Linguistic Analysis 2 .4, 303-351. - Cole, J. 2026. Prosody and information structure.
Annual Review Linguistics 12 , 387-406. 10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011724-121524 - Féry, C. and Samek-Lodovici, V. 2006. Focus projection and prosodic prominence in nested foci.
Language 82 .1, 131-150. 10.1353/lan.2006.0031 - Howell, J. 2011. Second occurrence focus and the acoustics of prominence. In R. Folli and C. Ulbrich (eds.),
Interfaces in Linguistics: New Research Perspectives . New York: Oxford University Press, 278-298. - Ishihara, S. and Féry, C. 2006. Phonetic correlates of second occurrence focus. In S. Ishihara, M. Schmitz and A. Schwarz (eds.),
Interdisciplinary Studies of Information Structure: Working Papers of the SFB 632 . Potsdam: University of Potsdam. - Ishihara, S. and Féry, C. 2009. The phonology of second occurrence focus.
Journal of Linguistics 45 .2, 285-313. 10.1017/S0022226709005702 - Jun, S.-A. 2003. Prosodic phrasing and attachment preferences.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32 .2, 219-249. 10.1023/A:1022452408944 - Jun, S.-A. 2005. Prosodic typology. In S.-A. Jun (ed.),
Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 430-458. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0016 - Jun, S.-A. and Lee, H.-J. 1998. Phonetic and phonological markers of contrastive focus in Korean.
Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing Vol. 4 . Sydney, Australia, 1295-1298. 10.21437/ICSLP.1998-151 - Kadmon, N. 2001.
Formal pragmatics: Semantics, pragmatics, presupposition and focus . Oxford: Blackwell. - Kayne, R. 1998. Overt vs. covert movement.
Syntax 1 .2, 128-191. 10.1111/1467-9612.00006 - Krifka, M. 2006. Association with focus phrases. In V. Molinár and S. Winkler (eds.),
The Architecture of Focus . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 105-136. 10.1515/9783110922011.105 - Lee, Y.-C. 2012. Prosodic correlation between the focusing adverb
ozik ‘only’ and focus/givenness in Korean.Journal of Speech Sciences 29 .2, 85-111. 10.20396/joss.v2i2.15034 - Lee, Y.-C. 2017. Prosodic focus in Seoul Korean and South Kyungsang Korean.
Linguistic Research 34. 1, 133-161. 10.17250/khisli.34.1.201703.005 - Lee, Y.-C., Nambu, S., and Cho, S. 2018. Focus prosody of telephone numbers in Tokyo Japanese.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 143. 5. EL343-EL346. 10.1121/1.5037360 - Lee, Y.-C., Wang, B., Chen, S. Adda-Decker, M., Amelot, A., Nambu, S., and Liberman, M. 2015. A crosslinguistic study of prosodic focus.
IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) , 4754-4758. 10.1109/ICASSP.2015.7178873 - Lee, Y.-C. and Xu, Y. 2010. Phonetic realization of contrastive focus in Korean.
Proceedings from the 5th International Conference on Speech Prosody . http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/yi/yispapers/Lee_Xu_SP2010.pdf. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2010-81 - Liu, J., Xu, Y., and Lee, Y.-C. 2019. Post-focus compression is not automatically transferred from Korean to L2 English.
Phonetics and Speech Sciences 11 .2, 15-21. 10.13064/KSSS.2019.11.2.015 - Partee, B. 1999. Focus, quantification, and semantics-pragmatics issues. In P. Bosch and R. van der Sandt (eds.),
Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 213-231. - R Core Team. 2017.
R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. (http://www.r-project.org). - Roberts, C. 1996. Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. In J. H. Yoon and A. Kathol (eds.),
Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics: Papers in Semantics 49 . Columbus, OH : Ohio State University, 91-136. - Rooth, M. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation.
Natural Language Semantics 1 .1, 75-116. 10.1007/BF02342617 - Schwarzschild, R. 1997. Why some foci must associate. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, ms.
- Schwarzschild, R. 1999. Givenness, avoidF and other constraints on the place of accents.
Natural Language Semantics 7 .2, 141-177. 10.1023/A:1008370902407 - Selkirk, E. O. 1995. Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress and phrasing. In J. A. Goldsmith (ed.),
The Handbook of Phonological Theory . Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 550-569. - Selkirk, E. O. 2002a. Contrastive FOCUS vs. presentational focus: Prosodic evidence from right node raising in English. In
Speech Prosody 2002: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Speech Prosody . Aix-en-Provence, 643-646. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2002-146 - Selkirk, E. O. 2002b. The syntax-phonology interface. In
International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences , Section 3.9, Article 23. Elsevier. - Selkirk, E. O. 2008. Contrastive focus, givenness, and the unmarked status of “discourse-new”.
Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55 .3-4, 1-16. 10.1556/ALing.55.2008.3-4.8 - Xu, Y. and Xu, C. X. 2005. Phonetic realization of focus in English declarative intonation.
Journal of Phonetics 33 , 159-197. 10.1016/j.wocn.2004.11.001 - Xu, Y. and Wang, M. 2009. Organizing syllables into groups - Evidence from F0 and duration patterns in Mandarin.
Journal of Phonetics 37. 4. 502-520. 10.1016/j.wocn.2009.08.003 23482405 PMC3589580
- Publisher :The Modern Linguistic Society of Korea
- Publisher(Ko) :한국현대언어학회
- Journal Title :The Journal of Studies in Language
- Journal Title(Ko) :언어연구
- Volume : 42
- No :1
- Pages :99-112
- DOI :https://doi.org/10.18627/jslg.42.1.202605.99


The Journal of Studies in Language





