Research Article
Abstract
References
Information
This study examines the usage of the relative pronouns ‘who’, ‘which’, and ‘that’ in both written and spoken English, focusing on how context influences pronoun choice. Through a corpus- based analysis of 400 sentences—200 from formal written English and 200 from casual spoken English—the study identifies significant differences in pronoun usage across registers. The findings reveal that in formal written contexts, ‘who’ and ‘which’ are strongly preferred, reflecting a need for clarity and precision. In contrast, spoken English shows a greater reliance on ‘that’, particularly with inanimate antecedents, highlighting the greater versatile and concise nature of spoken language. Statistical analyses, including chi-square and binomial tests, were used to assess the significance of these differences. Additionally, Cramér’s V was calculated to measure the strength of association between context and pronoun choice. The results suggest a moderate association for ‘who’ vs. ‘that’ (Cramér’s V = 0.28) and a stronger association for ‘which’ vs. ‘that’ (Cramér’s V = 0.53), confirming that context plays a crucial role in relative pronoun selection. These findings have important implications for both linguistic theory and English language pedagogy, underscoring the need to teach context-sensitive grammar to learners.
- Arnold, J. E. and Zerkle, S. A. 2019. Why Do People Produce Pronouns? Pragmatic Selection vs. Rational Models. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 34.9, 1152-1175. 10.1080/23273798.2019.1636103
- Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., and Finegan, E. 2000. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
- Boulton, A. 2017. Corpora in Language Teaching and Learning. Language Teaching 50.4, 483-506. 10.1017/S0261444817000167
- Cheshire, J. 2007. Discourse Variation, Grammaticalization and Stuff like That. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11.2, 155-193. 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00317.x
- Conrad, S. and Biber, D. 2014. Multi-dimensional Methodology and the Dimensions of Register Variation in English. In Variation in English, London: Routledge, 13-42.
- Conrod, K. 2019. Pronouns Raising and Emerging. Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.
- Daskalaki, E. 2020. Types of Relative Pronouns. In Syntactic architecture and its consequences II, 277.
- Declerck, R. 1991. A Comprehensive Descriptive Grammar of English. Tokyo: Kaitakusha, 200-213.
- Huddleston, R. and Pullum, G. 2005. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 53.2, 193-194. 10.1515/zaa-2005-0209
- Kortmann, B. 2020. English Linguistics: Essentials. Berlin: Springer Nature. 10.1007/978-3-476-05678-8
- McEnery, T. and Hardie, A. 2011. Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511981395
- Poletto, C. and Sanfelici, E. 2018. On Relative Complementizers and Relative Pronouns. Linguistic Variation 18.2, 265-298. 10.1075/lv.16002.pol
- Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, S., and Svartvik, J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
- Rohde, H., Kehler, A., and Elman, J. L. 2007. Pronoun Interpretation as a Side Effect of Discourse Coherence. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 29.29.
- Seppänen, A. 2014. The Genitives of the Relative Pronouns in Present-day English. In Taming the Vernacular. London: Routledge, 152-169.
- Torgersen, E. N., Gabrielatos, C., Hoffmann, S., and Fox, S. 2011. A Corpus-based Study of Pragmatic Markers in London English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 7.1, 93-118. 10.1515/cllt.2011.005
- Publisher :The Modern Linguistic Society of Korea
- Publisher(Ko) :한국현대언어학회
- Journal Title :The Journal of Studies in Language
- Journal Title(Ko) :언어연구
- Volume : 40
- No :4
- Pages :499-510
- DOI :https://doi.org/10.18627/jslg.40.4.202502.499