All Issue

2026 Vol.42, Issue 1 Preview Page

Research Article

31 May 2026. pp. 69-83
Abstract
This study aims to explore EFL graduate students’ academic writing experiences and their developmental process at a university. Grounded in the transactional theory of stress and coping, an analysis of qualitative reflections from 17 participants revealed a three-phase process of stress adaptation: appraisal, coping, and reappraisal. Initially, students appraised high-stakes writing tasks as a ‘threat’ due to the gap between rigorous academic demands and their limited linguistic resources (Phase 1). However, this anxiety was effectively reduced through the mobilization of dual coping strategies (Phase 2). They utilized AI tools as problem-focused resources to overcome linguistic barriers, while simultaneously seeking teacher feedback as an emotion-focused resource for validation. This synergistic support facilitated a cognitive reappraisal, transforming the initial threat into a manageable ‘challenge’ and fostering students’ identities as independent scholars (Phase 3). The findings suggest a pedagogical paradigm shift toward a hybrid instructional model, where AI-driven efficiency and human-driven empathy coexist to cultivate confident, autonomous writers in the digital era.
References
  1. Aitchison, C. and Lee, A. 2006. Research Writing: Problems and Pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education 11.3, 265-279. 10.1080/13562510600680574
  2. Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M. 1987. An Attainable Version of High Literacy: Approaches to Teaching Higher-order Skills in Reading and Writing. Curriculum Inquiry 17.1, 9-30. 10.1080/03626784.1987.11075275
  3. Bitchener, J. and Ferris, D. R. 2012. Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203832400
  4. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. 2013. Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. London: SAGE Publications.
  5. Carless, D. and Boud, D. 2018. The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 43.8, 1315-1325. 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
  6. Casanave, C. P. 2014. Uses of Narrative in L2 Writing Research. In Second Language Writing Research. London: Routledge, 17-32.
  7. Cheng, Y. S. 2004. A Measure of Second Language Writing Anxiety: Scale Development and Preliminary Validation. Journal of Second Language Writing 13.4, 313-335. 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.07.001
  8. Choi, J. 2013. Does Peer Feedback Affect L2 Writers’ L2 Learning, Composition Skills, Metacognitive Knowledge, and L2 Writing Anxiety? English Education 68.3, 187-213. 10.15858/engtea.68.3.201309.187
  9. Ellis, R. and Yuan, F. 2004. The Effects of Planning on Fluency, Complexity, and Accuracy in Second Language Narrative Writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26.1, 59-84. 10.1017/S0272263104261034
  10. Faigley, L. and Witte, S. 1981. Analyzing Revision. College Composition and Communication 32.4, 400-414. 10.58680/ccc198115887
  11. Ferris, D. R. 2003. Response to Student Writing: Implications for Second Language Students. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781410607201
  12. Ferris, D. R. 2011. Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.2173290
  13. Ferris, D. R. and Hedgcock, J. S. 2023. Teaching L2 Composition: Purpose, Process, and Practice. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003004943
  14. Flower, L. and Hayes, J. R. 1981. A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication 32.4, 365-387. 10.58680/ccc198115885-
  15. Folkman, S. 2008. The Case for Positive Emotions in the Stress Process. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping 21.1, 3-14. 10.1080/10615800701740457
  16. Hansen, J. G. and Liu, J. 2005. Guiding Principles for Effective Peer Response. ELT Journal 59.1, 31-38. 10.1093/elt/cci004
  17. Hattie, J. and Timperley, H. 2007. The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research 77.1, 81-112. 10.3102/003465430298487
  18. Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., and Cope, J. 1986. Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety. The Modern Language Journal 70.2, 125-132. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x
  19. Hyland, K. 2004. Genre and Second Language Writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.23927
  20. Hyland, K. 2016. Teaching and Researching Writing. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315717203
  21. Hyland, K. and Hyland, F. 2006. Feedback on Second Language Students’ Writing. Language Teaching 39.2, 83-101. 10.1017/S0261444806003399
  22. Jeon, Y. 2018. The Effect of Learner-Centered EFL Writing Instruction on Korean University Students’ Writing Anxiety and Perception. TESOL International Journal 13.3, 100-112.
  23. Kellogg, R. T. 2004. Working Memory Components in Written Sentence Generation. The American Journal of Psychology 117.3, 341-361. 10.2307/4149005
  24. Kotamjani, S. S., Samad, A. A., and Fahimirad, M. 2018. International Postgraduate Students’ Perception of Challenges in Academic Writing in Malaysian Public Universities. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature 7.7, 191-195. 10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.7p.191
  25. Kroll, B. 2003. Exploring the Dynamics of Second Language Writing (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524810
  26. Lazarus, R. S. 2000. Toward Better Research on Stress and Coping. American Psychologist 55.6, 665-673. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.6.665
  27. Lazarus, R. S. and Folkman, S. 1984. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York, NY: Springer.
  28. Leki, I. 1995. Coping Strategies of ESL Students in Writing Tasks Across the Curriculum. TESOL Quarterly 29.2, 235-260. 10.2307/3587624
  29. Lundstrom, K. and Baker, W. 2009. To Give is Better Than to Receive: The Benefits of Peer Review to the Reviewer’s Own Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 18.1, 30-43. 10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002
  30. Min, H. T. 2005. Training Students to Become Successful Peer Reviewers. System 33.2, 293-308. 10.1016/j.system.2004.11.003
  31. Nicol, D. J. and Macfarlane-Dick, D. 2006. Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice. Studies in Higher Education 31.2, 199-218. 10.1080/03075070600572090
  32. Roca de Larios, J., Manchón, R. M., Murphy, L., and Marín, J. 2008. The Foreign Language Writer’s Strategic Behaviour in the Allocation of Time to Writing Processes. Journal of Second Language Writing 17.1, 30-47. 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.08.005
  33. Sasaki, M. 2000. Toward an Empirical Model of EFL Writing Processes: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Second Language Writing 9.3, 259-291. 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00028-X
  34. Sasaki, M. 2004. A Multiple-Data Analysis of the 3.5-Year Development of EFL Student Writers. Language Learning 54.3, 525-582. 10.1111/j.0023-8333.2004.00264.x
  35. Silva, T. 1993. Toward an Understanding of the Distinct Nature of L2 Writing: The ESL Research and Its Implications. TESOL Quarterly 27.4, 657-677. 10.2307/3587400
  36. Sommers, N. 1980. Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers. College Composition and Communication 31.4, 378-388. 10.58680/ccc198015930
  37. Swales, J. M. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  38. Tardy, C. M. and Matsuda, P. K. 2009. The Construction of Author Voice by Editorial Board Members. Written Communication 26.1, 32-52. 10.1177/0741088308327269
  39. Wallace, D. L., Hayes, J. R., Hatch, J. A., Miller, W., Moser, G., and Silk, C. M. 1996. Better Revision in Eight Minutes? Prompting First-year College Writers to Revise Globally. Journal of Educational Psychology 88.4, 682-695. 10.1037/0022-0663.88.4.682
  40. Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., and Rowntree, J. 2017. Supporting Learners’ Agentic Engagement With Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes. Educational Psychologist 52.1, 17-37. 10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538
  41. Zamel, V. 1982. Writing: The Process of Discovering Meaning. TESOL Quarterly 16.2, 195-209. 10.2307/3586792
  42. Zimmerman, B. J. 2000. Attaining Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective. In Handbook of Self-Regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 13-39. 10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
Information
  • Publisher :The Modern Linguistic Society of Korea
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국현대언어학회
  • Journal Title :The Journal of Studies in Language
  • Journal Title(Ko) :언어연구
  • Volume : 42
  • No :1
  • Pages :69-83