All Issue

2021 Vol.37, Issue 2 Preview Page

Research Article

August 2021. pp. 227-238
Abstract
Obeying the rules of politeness in all languages is a major contributing factor to speaking favorably. It has been the safest and the most effective way to achieve a successful communication for ages. Being accepted as a way of speaking with humble and agreeable words, euphemisms are used in discourse instead of harsh or unpleasant words. They are mainly used to replace languages of many unpleasant topics, like sex, pregnancy, politics, WC, death, disability and many more. What is more, dealing with impolite subjects and seeking alternatives to bitter terms are very similar. Using Relevance theory to study euphemisms helps to understand how speakers develop new euphemisms and also helps to compare and contrast euphemisms for the same topic in English and Uzbek.
References
  1. Algeo, J. and T. Pyles. 2009. The Origins and Development of the English Language. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
  2. Allan, K. and K. Burridge. 2006. Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge. 10.1017/CBO9780511617881
  3. Carston, R. and G. Powell. 2006. Relevance theory: New directions and developments. In E. LePore & B. C. Smith (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the philosophy of language, 341-360. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Crespo, F. E. 2006. The Language of Death: Euphemism and Conceptual Metaphorization in Victorian Obituaries. SKY Journal of Linguistics 19, 101-130.
  5. Dong, J. and X. Zhao. 2010. Study on the Features of English Political Euphemism and its Social Function. English Language Teaching 3, 118-121. 10.5539/elt.v3n1p118
  6. Enright, D. 2004. In Other Words. London: Michael O’Mara Books Limited.
  7. Greer, G. 1971. The Female Eunuch. New York: Farrer, Straus and Giroux.
  8. Hughes, G. 2006. An Encyclopedia of Swearing. The social history of oaths, profanity, foul language, and ethnic slurs in the English-speaking world. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
  9. Karimov, D. 1985. Stories. Youth 5, 15.
  10. Linfoot-Ham, K. 2005. The linguistics of euphemism: A diachronic study of euphemism formation. Journal of Language and Linguistics 4. 227-263.
  11. Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Euphemism. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/euphemism/
  12. McGlone, M. S., G. A. Beck, and R. A. Pfiester. 2006. Contamination and camouflage in euphemisms. Communication Monographs 73, 261-282. 10.1080/03637750600794296
  13. Neaman, J. and C. Silver. 1990. Kind Words: A Treasure of Euphemisms. New York: McGraw Hill Publishers.
  14. Pinker, S. 1997. How the mind works. New York: W.W.Norton, 661.
  15. Qosimov, D. 2015, April 16. Jamiyatdagi gaplar... . Kun. https://kun.uz/category/jamiyat/
  16. Rawson, S. 1981. A Dictionary of Euphemism and other Double Talk. New York: Crown Publishers.
  17. Samoškaitė, L. 2011. 21st century political euphemisms in English newspapers: semantic and structural study. MA Paper. Vilnius Pedagogical University.
  18. Sperber, D. and D. Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  19. Sperber, D. and D. Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
  20. Swaddle. 2017, March 28. A Brief History of Pregnancy Euphemisms. https://theswaddle.com/pregnancy-euphemisms/
  21. Sytnyk, A. 2011. ―Ad hoc concepts and euphemism treadmill: a cognitive-pragmatic account. Studia Methodologica : Scientific works 32, 206-209. Ternopil, Ukraine.
  22. To’raxo’jaeva, Sh. 2018, June 10. Bizga turli ittifoqlar kerak. Xabar. https://xabar.uz/jamiyat/bizga-turli-ittifoqlar-kerak/
  23. Wilson, D. and A. Carston. 2007. A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. In N.C. Burton-Roberts (ed.), Pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 230-259. 10.1057/978-1-349-73908-0_12
  24. Yoqubov, O. 1994. The Treasure of Ulughbekh. Tashkent: Gafur Gulam press.
Information
  • Publisher :The Modern Linguistic Society of Korea
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국현대언어학회
  • Journal Title :The Journal of Studies in Language
  • Journal Title(Ko) :언어연구
  • Volume : 37
  • No :2
  • Pages :227-238