Research Article
Abstract
References
Information
Despite the increasing use of loanwords in Korean, the psycholinguistic differences between processing loanwords and native words remain understudied. This study compares the processing of loanwords (e.g., 세일즈맨) and native words (e.g., 영업사원) during Korean sentence reading using an online self-paced reading task with 96 native Korean readers. The slower recognition of loanwords compared to native words, regardless of participants' reading skills, suggests that there exists a categorical distinction between loanwords and native words in the mental lexicon of Korean readers. However, no significant difference was observed in sentence comprehension times between loanwords and native words, indicating that, despite the difference in lexical processing, the use of loanwords does not necessarily hinder sentence reading.
- 권유안, 김영진, 남기춘. 2003. 관계절 두어(head noun)의 정보와 조사의 정보를 이용한 한국어 문장의 재분석과정. 언어청각장애연구, 8.1, 41-65.
- 국립국어원. 2010. 국민의 언어 의식 조사. 서울: 국립국어원.
- 국립국어원. 2020. 국민의 언어 의식 조사. 서울: 국립국어원.
- 김병진, 백현아, 이윤형, 최원일. 2021. 웹 기반 온라인 자기조절읽기과제를 이용한 단어 예측성 효과의 반복 검증. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 33.2, 87-93.
- 박선희, 김현우. 2022. 제2언어 한국어 정보구조 습득 연구 -여격 구문의 생산과 실시간 처리를 중심으로-. 한국어교육, 33.4, 71-89.
- 성은진, 이윤형, 최원일. 2020. 덩이글 읽기 시 글의 난이도와 인지 능력 개인차의 상호작용 효과: 안구 운동 추적 연구. 한국심리학회지: 인지 및 생물, 32.2, 223-234.
- 이광오. 2003. 단어인지 수행은 어종에 따라 다를까? 한국심리학회지: 실험, 15.4, 479-498.
- 이선경, 남예은, 이윤형. 2021. 웹기반 온라인 주의 연구: 온라인 실험은 실험실 실험만큼 효과적일까? 한국자료분석학회, 23.3, 1355-1368.
- 임채영, 최원일. 2023. 한글 시각 단어재인 시의 동음이의어 이득 효과: 어휘판단과제로부터의 증거. 언어과학연구, 104, 67-88. 10.21296/jls.2023.03.104.67
- 조용구, 이경남. 2020. 국어 텍스트 분석 프로그램(KReaD 지수)의 개발. 독서연구, 56, 225-245. 10.17095/JRR.2020.56.8
- 표준국어대사전. 외래어. https://stdict.korean.go.kr/search/searchView.do?word_no=462599&searchKeywordTo=3
- 표준국어대사전. 고유어. https://stdict.korean.go.kr/search/searchView.do?word_no=395883&searchKeywordTo=3
- Acheson, D. J., Wells, J. B., and MacDonald, M. C. 2008. New and Updated Tests of Print Exposure and Reading Abilities in College Students. Behavior Research Methods 40.1, 278-289. 10.3758/BRM.40.1.278 18411551 PMC3022331
- Ashby, J., Rayner, K., and Clifton, C. 2005. Eye Movements of Highly Skilled and Average Readers: Differential Effects of Frequency and Predictability. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A 58.6, 1065-1086. 10.1080/02724980443000476 16194948
- Baek, H., Gordon, P. C., and Choi, W. 2024. Effects of Age and Word Frequency on Korean Visual Word Recognition: Evidence From a Web-Based Large-Scale Lexical-Decision Task. Psychology and Aging 39.3, 231-244. 10.1037/pag0000793 38236269
- Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., and Walker, S. C. 2015. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67.1, 1-48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
- Bultena, S., Dijkstra, T., and Van Hell, J. 2014. Cognate Effects in Sentence Context Depend on Word Class, L2 Proficiency, and Task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 67.6, 1214-1241. 10.1080/17470218.2013.853090 24295513
- Jeong, H. and Kim, H. 2023. Differences in Korean Learners’ Acquisition of Causative Expressions: Focus on Learners’ Proficiency Level. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 8.1, 1-24. 10.1186/s40862-023-00192-7
- Johns, M. A. and Dussias, P. E. 2021. Of Revistas and Magacines: Lexical Competition in the Online Processing of Established Loanwords. Journal of Second Language Studies 4.2, 375-411. 10.1075/jsls.21010.joh
- Kim, D., Lowder, M., and Choi, W. 2021. Effects of Print Exposure on an Online Lexical Decision Task: A Direct Replication Using a Web-Based Experimental Procedure. Frontiers in Psychology 12, 1-9. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.710663 34456825 PMC8385780
- Kim, S. and Kim, J. 2012. Frequency Effects in L2 Multiword Unit Processing: Evidence From Self-Paced Reading. TESOL Quarterly 46.4, 831-841. 10.1002/tesq.66
- Kuitert, S. R. 2013. English Loanwords in Norwegian. Master’s Thesis. Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
- Kuperman, V. and Van Dyke, J. A. 2011. Effects of Individual Differences in Verbal Skills on Eye-Movement Patterns during Sentence Reading. Journal of Memory and Language 65.1, 42-73. 10.1016/j.jml.2011.03.002 21709808 PMC3119501
- Lee, H., Seong, E., Choi, W., and Lowder, M. 2019. Development and Assessment of the Korean Author Recognition Test. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 72.7, 1837-1836. 10.1177/1747021818814461 30404575
- Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., and Lindeløv, J. K. 2019. PsychoPy2: Experiments in Behavior Made Easy. Behavior Research Methods 51, 195-203. 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y 30734206 PMC6420413
- Perfetti, C. 2007. Reading Ability: Lexical Quality to Comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading 11.4, 357-383. 10.1080/10888430701530730
- Perfetti, C. A. and Hart, L. 2002. The Lexical Quality Hypothesis. In Verhoeven, L. Elbro, C. and Reitsma, P. (eds.), Precursors of functional literacy. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins 189-213. 10.1075/swll.11.14per
- R Core Team. 2024. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
- Tamaoka, K. and Miyaoka, Y. 2003. The Cognitive Processing of Japanese Loanwords in Katakana. Japanese Psychological Research 45.2, 69-79.
- Publisher :The Modern Linguistic Society of Korea
- Publisher(Ko) :한국현대언어학회
- Journal Title :The Journal of Studies in Language
- Journal Title(Ko) :언어연구
- Volume : 40
- No :3
- Pages :289-301
- DOI :https://doi.org/10.18627/jslg.40.3.202411.289